International Organization for Plant Information
Provisional Global Plant Checklist
  
Home
Query the checklist
What's new
About the checklist
Contacts


FireFox
search plugin

Details for: Alchemilla sedelmeyeriana

4 different source(s) use this name:

- Pankhurst, R. - Rosaceae database 2007.
- Pankhurst, R.: Rosaceae database, 2005
- Pankhurst, R.: Rosaceae database, 2006
- Vascular Plants of Russia and Adjacent Countries as of 26.10.96

Source: Pankhurst, R. - Rosaceae database 2007. [IOPI preferred view]
Name: Alchemilla sedelmeyeriana Juz.
Nomencl. ref. Fl. Kavk., ed.1, 4: 324. 1934
Rank: Species
Status: ACCEPTED
Taxonomy (this taxon is included in): Familia - Rosaceae Juss.
    Subfamilia - Rosoideae (Juss.) Arn.
        Tribus - Poterieae Dumort.
            Genus - Alchemilla L.
                
Name Notes: Name-Source: Pl. Russia (1995)
 

Source: Pankhurst, R.: Rosaceae database, 2005
Name: Alchemilla sedelmeyeriana Juz.
Nomencl. ref. Fl. Kavk., ed.1, 4, 324. 1934.
Rank: Species
Status: ACCEPTED
Taxonomy (this taxon is included in): Familia - Rosaceae Juss.
    Subfamilia - Rosoideae (Juss.) Arn.
        Tribus - Poterieae Dumort.
            Genus - Alchemilla L.
                
Name Notes: Name-Source: Pl. Russia (1995)
 

Source: Pankhurst, R.: Rosaceae database, 2006
Name: Alchemilla sedelmeyeriana Juz.
Nomencl. ref. Fl. Kavk., ed.1, 4: 324. 1934
Rank: Species
Status: ACCEPTED
Taxonomy (this taxon is included in): Familia - Rosaceae Juss.
    Subfamilia - Rosoideae (Juss.) Arn.
        Tribus - Poterieae Dumort.
            Genus - Alchemilla L.
                
Name Notes: Name-Source: Pl. Russia (1995)
 
SourceStatusDesignation: A

Source: Vascular Plants of Russia and Adjacent Countries as of 26.10.96
Name: Alchemilla sedelmeyeriana Juz.
Rank: Species
Status: ACCEPTED
Taxonomy (this taxon is included in): Genus - Alchemilla
    
 
SourceHigherTaxon from IOPI: Rosaceae
SourceStatusDesignation: A

  © 1996-2007 The International Organization for Plant Information.
This page last updated: Dienstag, 21. August 2007
Comments